19. What is your view of Hinduism? Are you for or against gurus?
19.1 The Rajneesh Diversion
Until the late 1960s, there was a strong bias against Indian religion in a country like Britain. Then a popular upsurge of interest occurred largely because the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi (1917-2008) temporarily converted the Beatles to his Transcendental Meditation. Hinduism then became very fashionable in the West, and mantras were glibly promoted to a new consumer audience.
A decade later, a far more extreme form of guruism occurred in the shape of Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh (1931-1990), whose ashram at Poona became notorious for permissive practices in which some people got hurt. Rajneesh was then caught in a predicament resulting from his agitations and excesses. He emigrated to Oregon, where his following got out of all control in the mid-1980s, demonstrating antisocial behaviour and terrorist tendencies that shocked America (Shepherd, Some Philosophical Critiques and Appraisals, pp. 58-74). Indian critics said that Rajneesh was not a true Hindu or a real guru because he employed Western alternative therapy and sexual libertinism to seduce his gullible audience, who were largely Westerners.
The teaching of Rajneesh was explicitly permissive, contrary to the traditional discipline observed by other Indian gurus. Yet some other famous gurus of a more traditional complexion also gained unfavourable reputations, including Swami Muktananda (1908-1982), who was reported to be sexually permissive in the abuse of disciples, and who was alleged to be involved in terror tactics and financial chicanery. The acquisition of wealth emerged as a danger symptom. More recently, Sri Chinmoy (1931-2007) has been profiled as a deceptive and predatory guru. See 13.23 above.
It was not only certain gurus who were deficient. The traditional discipline of Hinduism was frequently overlooked by Western enthusiasts reared to a different lifestyle. Many hippies and neo-hippies adopted elements of Hindu teachings, but made no serious attempt to be celibate, for instance. Yoga became a commercial exercise in the West, while the textual and historical complexities of Hinduism were almost exclusively an academic preserve, to which the popular manifestations of enthusiasm were indifferent. That discrepant situation continues today.
19.2 Swami Ghanananda
My own introduction to Hinduism occurred just before the wave of popular interest, and I was able to witness some of the changes that took place in the reassessment of the late 60s and early 70s. In 1967 I undertook a brief retreat at the Ramakrishna Vedanta Centre in London. The presiding figure was Swami Ghanananda (1898-1969), a senior monk of the Ramakrishna Order (more specifically, the Ramakrishna Math and Mission). He was very disciplined in his lifestyle, but also communicative and very humorous at the communal mealtable. A South Indian brahman, he had gained an academic degree at Madras University. He had known some of the last living disciples of Ramakrishna of Dakshineshwar, the figurehead of his monastic order. In India that monastic order was noted for attention to social work in addition to the traditional contemplative routines. I was unable to find any fault with the example of Ghanananda. However, I did not choose to join the monastic order as he suggested. I wished to maintain a neutral attitude towards different religious movements, and that was the course I took.
Monks like Ghanananda did not receive any high profile publicity. He was known only to a small local audience of supporters and Ramakrishna devotees in London, and died a few years later unknown to the media. He lived in a simple room at a house in Muswell Hill that he had acquired for his Order. In acute contrast were the television appearances of the Maharishi that made the dispenser of Transcendental Meditation (TM) a famous icon of flower power and a showbiz personality. The Beatles were attracted and then repelled, and in later years the Maharishi was reported to be charging very substantial fees to the super-rich who attended his meditation retreats. The TM enterprise is said to be worth more than three billion dollars. In contrast, the retreat I attended at Muswell Hill was free of charge, and was solely a matter of personal study at one’s own convenience. There were only three retreatants, no media ads being involved.
19.3 Swami Vivekananda
Ghanananda sometimes complained that Westerners in general did not understand Hindu religion, and were at a loss to evaluate entities like Swami Vivekananda (1863-1902), who had been the founder of his Order in the 1890s. An academic friend of mine who studied Western philosophy demonstrated the ethnocentric drawback. He caricatured Vivekananda for being too stout in build and too oratorical in some of his lectures following his successful appearance at the Chicago Parliament of Religions in 1893. However, the critic did concede that Vivekananda had to compete with Christian missionaries in the late Victorian era, and that his concern with social improvement and sense of affinity with the poor did set him apart from the Transcendental Meditation exemplar. The critic had a degree in chemistry, and preferred Schopenhauer to Vedanta. His attitude was perhaps typical of British universities at that period, meaning the 1960s.
Swami Vivekananda is not fairly comparable to the later spate of Indian gurus who migrated to the West. Their laxities and commercial appetites contrast with Vivekananda’s preferred austerity, his many free lectures and classes, and his rather memorable anguish over the fate of his depressed countrymen who suffered under the brahmanical or priestly regime (and not just the British Empire opportunism). His opposition to priestly attitudes and phobias is notable. The priestly contingent criticised him for leaving the homeland of India, regarding him as an outcaste on the basis of this action. He often ridiculed the orthodox stigmas. After spending a few years in the West, he returned to India and subsequently established the monastic organisation known as Ramakrishna Math, named after his teacher in Bengal. His approach to some aspects of conventional Hindu religion was radical, evidencing a reformist temperament. He lamented the plight of women and untouchables.
Vivekananda elevated Advaita Vedanta to a pinnacle position in his ideology. However, he also extolled other dimensions of Hinduism. His last years were afflicted by ill-health, and he died at the age of thirty-nine. His lectures, correspondence, and other output can be found in The Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda, a multi-volume collection having achieved successive editions. See also S. N. Dhar, A Comprehensive Biography of Swami Vivekananda (2 vols, 1975-6). Another atmospheric work is Reminiscences of Swami Vivekananda by his Eastern and Western Admirers (1961).
19.4 Maharishi Mahesh Yogi
The Maharishi Mahesh Yogi remained a problem to many critical onlookers. His Transcendental Meditation (TM) involved the repetitious chanting of mantras, and critics viewed this as a mere form of self-hypnosis, despite the strong claims made by partisans. In the 1970s, the Maharishi innovated the TM-Sidhi programme, which stressed levitation. He said on television in 1978 that thousands of his students could levitate. Many claims were made for the benefits of Yogic Flying, though sceptics still abound.
Maharishi Mahesh Yogi
The notorious inclination of the Maharishi for commercial gains was another deterrent. His first world tour occurred in 1958, when he had only a modest following. Over the decades he gained many thousands of followers and nearly one thousand TM centres worldwide. His income was reported to be six million pounds a year. In Britain alone he purchased several mansions. In 1998 his property assets were valued at 3.5 billion dollars. (FAIR news, April 2008, p. 14). By the time of his death in 2008, the charge for a five day session of TM was 2,500 dollars, while a three day induction course was promoted at £1,280. Other meditation enthusiasts affirm that one can meditate for free, and without the distraction of the siddhis (powers) programme.
19.5 Fashions, Indology, and Neo-Advaita
The American enthusiasm for Eastern religions was very much stronger than the British counterpart, which tended to reflect the big brother. During the 1970s the various fashions and trends in this sector of interest were often very unconvincing and even ludicrous. The callow attitudes culminated in the Rajneesh debacle. Some gurus were making vast sums of money, and Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh (alias Osho) acquired a large and superfluous fleet of Rolls Royce automobiles for which he invented an indulgent explanation to bemuse his fervent followers (see article 24 on this site). During that decade I studied more Buddhism than Hinduism, though I rectified the imbalance during the 1980s at CUL. Some of the results were included in Minds and Sociocultures Vol. One (1995), pp. 389-721, which is actually an analysis of both Vedism and Hinduism, and using the works of Indologists like Jan Gonda.
Indology is not popular amongst many followers of sectarian Hinduism. Analysis of hard core matters extends to caste principles, rigorous examination of textual sources claimed as divine inspiration, and the formation process involved in sectarian organisation and doctrine. For instance, there are many texts attributed to the early medieval Advaita exponent Shankara. However, specialist scholars do not accept the authenticity of various Shankara texts. Also, the strong hagiological component in the annals of sectarian Hinduism is notorious amongst Indologists. In a more comprehensive sense, Indian Philosophy (2010) is a diverse phenomenon, varying from the academic example of Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan to the origins of Buddhism and Jainism.
Investigators of new age literature observed that the ashram of the deceased Ramana Maharshi (1879-1950) had been incorporated on the “alternative” map of tourist activities. This development was accompanied by disconcerting trends of exegesis amongst some Western enthusiasts in relation to the Advaita teaching of Ramana, who lived in the Tamil country of South India. I had first read about Ramana Maharshi when I was sixteen, and the general situation was very different then. Much of his fame was posthumous, and achieved caricature in the American new age. His lifestyle of basic simplicity did not involve any miracle stunts or insidious economic expansion (Some Philosophical Critiques and Appraisals, pp.153-158). He taught a version of Advaita Vedanta, a traditional doctrine of “non-dualism” which has provoked imitations and misunderstandings.
An early promoter of Ramana Maharshi was Paul Brunton, whose Hidden Teaching Beyond Yoga (1941) became popular in the West. Brunton was by that time banned from Ramanashram as a plagiarist, and ventured an ethical criticism of Ramana. Brunton's career is in dispute. His well known book A Search in Secret India (1934) is noted for a rejection of Meher Baba (1894-1969), the presentation being markedly distorted and misleading. Meher Baba is a figure sometimes associated with Hinduism, but he was actually of Zoroastrian birth, his father being Sheriar Mundegar Irani. Meher Baba did include Advaita vocabulary in his teaching, but was not a Vedantist. One of his teachers, Upasni Maharaj, was a Hindu, but another was a Muslim, meaning Hazrat Babajan of Poona. Like other religious movements, the Meher Baba movement has exhibited a tendency to suppression of unwanted materials.
The first Western guru to extensively misappropriate the Advaita doctrine was an American who sported the names of Da Free John and Adi Da Samraj (see article 14 above). His antinomian example did not resemble the restrained lifestyle of Ramana Maharshi and other Hindu Advaitins. There have since been various other Western claimants to the desired achievements associated with the Advaita doctrine, including Andrew Cohen. This trend is known as neo-Advaita, and has strong tendencies to a commercial exposure. The macrocosm-microcosm doctrine associated with the Sanskrit words Brahman and atman is rather easily annexed, and with no great philosophical acuity in many cases. The facile claim is evidently a problem in India also, though contrasting devotional doctrines are more popular.
19.6 Atheistic Rationalism Versus Miracles
In recent years also, a quite different trend of exegesis has emerged in India that is associated with atheistic rationalism. This manifested in a noteworthy campaign by Basava Premanand (1930-2009) to expose the deceits of holy men in claiming “miracles” and supernormal feats. The large population of Hindu holy men comprise varying temperaments ranging from retiring meditators to exhibitionists using crude forms of showmanship in full public view. The very deceptive “miracle” feats such as swallowing fire and walking on burning coals have gained alternative explanations due to the fact that atheistic Indian rationalists can perform the same feats, as the latter have demonstrated on the media.
It is rather obvious that the desire to appear spiritually advanced can take liberties with the credulity of an audience. The opposition of Premanand to Sathya Sai Baba involved a campaign to expose purported “miracles” that relied upon sleight of hand and other deceptions. However, the miracle ruse is not the only basis for complaint in that direction (see 23.7 and 23.8 on this site). An extensive critical website on Sathya Sai is maintained by ex-devotee Robert Priddy. There are currently many audiences who need to be on their guard against gullible tendencies, lofty claims, and presumed holiness based upon external trappings.
One problem for generalising coverages is the proportion of those Hindu gurus and practitioners who do not rely upon “miracle” stunts in their projection. It is not appropriate to classify them with the obvious exhibitionists who exploit credulity in crude ways. The “non-miracle” category have varied in their disposition, and eccentricities are visible here and there. Some of these entities may still exploit the appearance of holiness, especially where any form of media is in the offing.
19.7 Ramakrishna and the Homoerotic Theory
Ramakrishna of Dakshineswar
A controversy has arisen concerning Ramakrishna of Dakshineswar (1836-1886). This Bengali brahman was the inspirer of Vivekananda, and lived at a Kali temple. His lifestyle was very simple, and he did not gain any great fame during his lifetime. He was averse to money, and did not acquire wealth. Though eccentric in certain of his habits, he was definitely not one of the miracle stunt holy men. He had no ashram or bank account. He did not take classes or give lectures, and did not write any books. His teachings during his last years were recorded in a lengthy work known in English as The Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna, originally the Bengali Kathamrita of Mahendranath Gupta. Aldous Huxley wrote an approving foreword to the 1944 English version translated by Swami Nikhilananda. A well known and more compact book by Christopher Isherwood is Ramakrishna and his Disciples (1965).
Three decades later, the very controversial Kali’s Child (1995; second edn, 1998) attempted to place Ramakrishna in a homoerotic perspective inspired by neoFreudian beliefs and the “personal lens” of Professor Jeffrey J. Kripal. A number of Western assessors accepted this book at face value, but in India (and elsewhere) there was strong resistance. The author was accused of possessing an inadequate knowledge of the Bengali language, and Kripal apologised for his translation errors (many of which were corrected in the second edition). Kali’s Child militated against the Kathamrita and an early Bengali biography by Swami Saradananda, and a critique from the Ramakrishna Order appeared in 2000. There were said to be 191 mistakes in the Kripal book, and the accusation was made that Kripal had deliberately ignored evidence which contradicted his theory. See further the critical analysis in Swami Tyagananda and P. Vrajaprana, Interpreting Ramakrishna: Kali’s Child Revisited (Delhi, 2010). See also Views on Ramakrishna.
Some say that Kripal created further confusions by writing (in 2003) an approving foreword to a disputed book by Adi Da Samraj, the notorious American guru who really was oriented to erotic experiences (see article 14 on this site). Kripal there expressed high praise of the Adi Da output, a factor which could spell the death of credibility for neoFreudian interpretations. The Kripal adventures in alternative thought subsequently endorsed the “anything goes” milieu of the Californian new age centre known as Esalen. See Kripal, Esalen: America and the Religion of No Religion (2007). One could argue that the Esalen-Grof-Adi Da-Kripal synthesis is a sure recipe for social and psychological confusions.
19.8 Aurobindo and Esalen
The association of Aurobindo with the Esalen Institute at Big Sur occurred over a decade after the death of that Hindu sage. The Californian “integral” consumption of varied doctrines has not always led to any clarification or resolution satisfactory to observers elsewhere.
Aurobindo Ghose (1872-1950) followed a much more traditional pattern than that associated with Daism. He had a sense of discipline that was foreign to some Esalen and “crazy wisdom” indulgences. He innovated “integral yoga,” and was a prolific writer. Originally a militant nationalist in opposition to the British Raj, his subsequent jail sentence was accompanied by a strong change in outlook. In 1910 he found refuge at the French colony of Pondicherry and began to write books on Hindu religion. His two most famous works are The Life Divine and The Synthesis of Yoga. See also the multi-volume Collected Works of Sri Aurobindo (1972). He retired into seclusion in 1926. A French female disciple gained salience from that time on by establishing his ashram, which he delegated to her supervision. The Shri Aurobindo Ashram only had some two dozen members at that time, though the number is much higher today. Mira Richard (1878-1973) became an authority figure known as “the Mother.” In the 1960s she established the colony of Auroville near the ashram at Pondicherry. Auroville is sometimes described as an international town. See further Aurobindo Ghose (2010).
The most well known book of Shri Aurobindo is The Life Divine, a lengthy work on spiritual evolution which has a canonical status at Auroville. This book also became influential at Esalen via the founder Michael Murphy. Some say that Esalen Aurobindo should be distinguished from the Indian original. The real Aurobindo had nothing to do with commercial “workshops” of new age innovation. Yet he made an unfortunate prediction in The Life Divine about “a race of gnostic spiritual beings.” This concept tended to be popular in Esalen circles. The context sounds unrealistically utopian to critical analysts. By current standards, such a race would take thousands or even millions of years to develop. There are both exacting and casual definitions of the word gnostic, which currently means something like superclown in the new age jargon emanating from Esalen.
The Human Potential Movement, associated with Esalen, was a seedbed for imaginations and assumptions about spiritual advancement (see article 10 on this site). The action of such imaginations may be described as something very similar to falling off a log into the mire of narcissism. There was a commercial edge to the “workshop” programmes of Esalen that cued the recruits to the excesses on record, which included psychoactive drugs advocated by the high priest of Esalen named Stanislav Grof. There were other casualties involved, including those sustained by the Findhorn Foundation Grof phase. The Esalen race of pseudo-gnostics and cued victims (who usually pay the former) are so frequently imagining that they are “self-realised,” “enlightened,” “integrated,” “empowered,” and many other variations on the same deceptive theme. Wisdom remains elusive, and is not purchasable in new age workshops, no matter how many thousands of dollars are extracted from the credulous.